SQE v LPC

Let’s explore the differences between the SQE and the LPC, to help you make an informed decision.

If you have read the first two posts in this miniseries where we looked at the SQE and LPC in detail, you should now have a clearer expectation of both. To further assist, examining the differences between them can help you work out which path suits you best.

Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) Route:

·     A law degree isn’t mandatory, but a recognised degree per the SRA is.
·     Offers broader access to the legal profession.
·     More cost-effective.
·     No requirement for a 2-year training contract with a law firm.
·     Requires 2 years of qualifying work experience.
·     Assessments are closed book.
·     No past papers for review.
·     A preparation course may be necessary for the assessments, potentially increasing costs.
·     International students must sit the SQE 2 skills exams in the UK.
·     Some countries allow sitting the SQE 1 locally, but verification with the SRA is needed.
·     Assessment is based on the competency of a day one qualified solicitor.

Legal Practice Course (LPC) Route:

·     Only accessible with a qualifying law degree recognised by the SRA.
·     Can be costly.
·     Mix of open and closed book exams provided by some institutions.
·     LPC access may be challenging for international students.
·     Assessment is based on the competency of a day one trainee in practice.
·     Requires a two-year training contract followed by additional skills assessments for qualification.

While there may be additional pros and cons, these are the primary distinctions between the two routes. Our upcoming posts will delve into what to expect from the SQE and LPC assessments, and address which is considered easier, as often asked.